Letter: U.N. could threaten rights of U.S. women, children
by Kathie Cummins
Jul 01, 2010 | 1184 views | 3 3 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
EDITOR,

In a recent article dated May 28, writer Peter Burke informed the community about SLV students “advising” Congresswoman Anna Eshoo on international civil rights (“SLV students advise congresswoman on international civil rights,” Page 7). The full topic was “The Rights of Women and Children in the International Community.”

There was no information given regarding the reporting done by the students, so readers have no way to know what conclusions they reached or how broadly they viewed their subject.

American women and children live in a society where the rule of law governs, and their rights are broader, more protective and more valuable than in any society in history.

The term “international community” itself is mythical. America has never signed on to the United Nations CEDAW (Convention of Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination) treaty, despite presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton championing its radical goals. It appears that Eshoo would like to see the Senate ratify this treaty, and she and her staff might indeed be drumming up support for that among SLV school youth. Do those who don’t share her positions participate? Or do they opt out of these advisory groups?

The U.N.’s position on legalizing prostitution, for example, is purportedly to eliminate sex trafficking. Yet U.N. workers themselves were involved in sex trafficking in Bosnia, according to an article by Wendy McElroy. The U.N. is silent on China’s one-child policy. Supporters of CEDAW claim that U.S. laws would not be adversely affected if this treaty were ratified. But it is a broadly held view by many others that the American family, religious institutions and, indeed, our very sovereignty would be dramatically altered. Information is available at Heritage Foundation. American religious hospitals would be forced, for example, to offer abortion. Why would self-governing people want to give over rights so many have died for to an unelected, corrupt and poorly managed foreign body like the U.N.?

One would hope that individual readers would take the time to Google CEDAW and read all sides about this U.N. treaty on gender politics.  If the local newspaper presents a subject of such importance with so little substance included, one has to ask why.

Kathie Cummins, Scotts Valley

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Julie Brooks
|
July 05, 2010
The UN is a fraud.
Judy Morgan
|
July 05, 2010
What is a community like San Lorenzo doing by allowing the United Nations and Eschoo to slurp up any time or energy of their children? Parents wake up. The students need to be spending their time becoming truly educated in the Three R's, the meaning of being an American, and enjoying their own families not allowing themselves to be manipulated by the lies of Congresswoman Eschoo and her ilk.
Jen Chase
|
July 03, 2010
The United States does not have to ratify CEDAW in order to be a leader in human rights. Signing a treaty does not make a country a leader in human rights. China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba and Burma, to name a few, have all ratified CEDAW but no one would seriously suggest that those nations have a better record than the United States for respecting the civil and human rights of women.


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at pbeditor@pressbanner.com.