Letter: Retail rhetoric is all wrong
by David Mader, Scotts Valley
Jan 28, 2010 | 811 views | 3 3 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
EDITOR,

A recently published letter talked about all the empty rhetoric concerning the Target store. I also believe that using facts is a better way to make decisions on our growth.

The rhetoric most often used by proponents of big retail in Scotts Valley is that it will help the city financially. For proof of this, I went online and found an interesting comparison between Gilroy and Scotts Valley.

Gilroy has already done what some here have suggested, by building a large, popular retail space called the Premium Outlets. For comparison, it has approximately 3.8 times more space than the Target. The only pertinent difference I could find was that Santa Clara County has nearly a 37 percent higher household income than Santa Cruz County, according to the 2000 census.

So, what did I find? The big picture is Gilroy is having just as many, if not more, financial problems than us. They even talked about closing a firehouse recently, and their original downtown is suffering because of the outlets. Please go onto the Web for all the details.

And please don’t use the tired old rhetoric that big retail will help us financially. The facts just don’t seem to verify that. Instead, let’s try something original, like living within our means.

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
David Mader
|
January 30, 2010
Over 50% Budge-I'm not sure if your reply was meant as a general comment on the Prison Guards Union or was directed at me. If the latter let me set the record straight. I have never been a prison guard or even known one. I retired after 34 yrs not 20. I make 10s of thousands less then 112k from my retirement. I am college educated. I do think the idea of sending some prisoner to Mexico is an interesting idea. Not that Easy-I still believe that the comparison is quite valid. Gilroy is 3.6x the population of SV and the Outlets are 3.8x larger than Target(2000 census). They also still seem to be very popular. I also disagree that we have to live within our means, but as I'm sure you agree that would be a very bad idea.
Not that easy
|
January 29, 2010
The Gilroy Outlets have been there, well, forever. Outlets have long ago passed their prime, and Gilroy many years back turned to auto dealerships as their primary source of sales tax dollars. Gilroy also has gobs of open space, and has (outside the housing bubble of last decade) very little housing demand. It's just a very bad comparator for SV.

"Living within our means?" That's a pretty easy phrase to toss out there. Tell that to the residents who want their parks maintained, their roads smooth, their storm drains operating, their sewer plant functional, and their first responders able to respond quickly. Go through the budgets of any of your local governing agencies -- city, water, fire, school -- you won't find any fluff there. Most are very thinly staff, and the stress level's pretty high as they try to just keep up (living within their means).

Big retail never was the answer in SV. For 40 years, no one ever thought a retailer the size of Target would ever consider locating here. I suspect the same will be said for the next 40 years. It was a blip in time. It's time for us to get over it. Little retail will have to suffice. We will live within our means. There really isn't any choice, is there?
Over 50% budge Union
|
January 29, 2010
So why sell out city to guarantee huge benefit packages. When you retiree at 20 with over $112,000 with no college, or continued education, you want to protect it. Prison guards outraged Gov wants to send illegal prisoners to Mexico to save money. That money is mostly overtime pay for guards. So retired hiding their affiliations covering for self serving brethren is 100% of time. not an exception based upon financial well being of city and citizens. Only protecting their self interests.

Over 50% of budget.


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at pbeditor@pressbanner.com.