Last year, library leaders were forced to chop more than $1 million from an already bare-bones budget.
In the midst of that bleakness, Scotts Valley’s planned new library symbolizes a beacon of hope, as organizers set out to build a branch that meets the needs of the times, said Teresa Landers, county library director.
“I’m very hopeful, because this will be the first facility that will have 21st-century standards, which will save staff time and provide more efficient services,” Landers said. “We’re desperate to have one that is functional and meets today’s standards.”
Landers has become a fixture in the community, contributing columns to local newspapers and leading planning meetings. Even in this time of uncertainty, Landers, who was hired as director in 2009, is a strong advocate for Scotts Valley’s future branch.
“There are a lot of libraries in Santa Cruz County, but without a lot of square footage,” Landers said. “It’s a lot of small, antiquated libraries. This one has the potential to be an over-20,000-square-foot library.”
Plans have steadily moved forward since the city bought the 23,000-square-foot Scotts Valley Sports Center last summer for $4.5 million, with designs to use about 13,000 square feet for the new library and the rest for retail options.
The project’s $7 million price tag will be paid for with nearly $5 million in borrowed bond money and another $2.7 million the city has saved from its redevelopment agency and developer fees. Since 1990, Scotts Valley has set aside about $330,000 of those fees each year specifically for a library.
Into the future, that $330,000 per year will be used to pay back the 30-year bond and interest on that bond, City Manager Steve Ando said.
The additional $7.8 million interest the bond will accumulate over 30 years — for a total bond repayment of $12.8 million — will also be paid with redevelopment money that the city agreed to spend on the library. By a written agreement, Santa Cruz County would have withheld that money from the city if it weren’t used to pay for a library, Ando said.
Scotts Valley Mayor Jim Reed, who is also a member of the Santa Cruz Public Libraries Joint Powers Board and a leading advocate for the project’s frugality, said that if the city chose to forgo building the library, it would lose access to that money.
“We’ve been committed for years to have to build,” Reed said. “If we don’t open soon, we are obligated to pay rent on the existing building.”
To help close escrow on the old sports center, the city borrowed about $2 million from its wastewater enterprise fund, which will also be paid back using redevelopment money. The city is required to repay the borrowed money with interest by 2014, Ando said.
Earlier plans to build a library on empty land in Skypark as the centerpiece of the proposed Town Center were tossed last year, when city leaders got the chance to buy the sports center from the Slawinski family and renovate it — a much cheaper proposition than building from the ground up, Reed said.
The Scotts Valley City Council is scheduled to review bids to build the library in July, and construction will likely begin in July or August.
“This is a great opportunity to get a sorely needed community space without impacting the general fund one dime,” Reed said.
The future is now
At 5,000 square feet, Scotts Valley’s existing library is almost three times smaller than the planned library. During the 32 hours it is open each week, it’s a hotspot for knitters, school children, researchers, homemakers, students and out-of-towners.
But many say the city has outgrown the space, and resources like seating and computers are stretched.
The Scotts Valley branch has the second-highest book checkout rate in the county. Last year, it had about 10,815 visitors, while another 342,600 people accessed the library’s Web site.
The Friends of the Library’s Scotts Valley Chapter has met there throughout the past year and half. So far, the group has raised $25,000 to furnish and fill the new library.
“This is not going to be just a basic library. We want it to reflect our community in Scotts Valley,” said Elizabeth Walsh, president of the Scotts Valley chapter. “There are a lot of families with children here, and we want it to be very family friendly.”
The Friends plan to have a large-print section for folks with limited vision and an expanded teen area. There will also be public art walls, Walch said.
Another new feature will be a self-checkout system, added to a knowledgeable staff available to help patrons. The building will be structured to allow automatic check-in to streamline the task of sorting books, too —
though the city cannot afford that system just yet.
“The goal is to have a setting in which everyone feels comfortable,” Walch said. “We want to make the library suitable for the community and reflective of what Scotts Valley wants. We’re eager to make it the best library it can be.”
The decorative themes are still to be determined, but the Friends hope to incorporate Scotts Valley’s history, Walch said.
People will have the opportunity to sponsor certain areas, she added.
Walch said the new library will also serve people in Felton and Boulder Creek, where library hours have been cut most drastically. The new branch will have the same schedule as the existing Scotts Valley library, and other libraries in the area will not change their hours as a result.
“We don’t expect any major changes as a result of the new library,” Landers said.
She said books to fill the library will be bought with gift money and taken from existing collections. There will be many more computers, as well, she added.
“A library serves the community on so many levels, especially in hard economic times,” Landers said. “It gives people a chance to research and look for jobs online for free. It’s a productive resource that offers free services.”




Put ALL bond selling to vote by the taxpayers.
We already have a library.
Is it cost effective to pursue this building?
Is this really the best, from the brightest, for the long term commitment?
Drop the your not an American if your against libraries diversion.
I agree with you that you only post positive things. However I can't recall any ideas or suggestions in any of your posts. Why do you even bother to post if the only purpose is to tell everyone that everything is great and nothing needs to be improved or changed. Please put your pom pom downs once in a while and offer some constructive comments.
and it's THAT school would get some money if the Library wasn't sucking up 20 million dollars worth. I know you like things half full, like the dilapidated roofs during the rains. No wonder you will send the kids to the library, they will need to dry off. You call your support positive when it robs the Middle school of precious funds? WHen it cost us all in wasted taxes which are needed in other places when there are OBVIOUS and less expensive choices? Positive is in the eye of the beholder and your remarks sounds like it ignores the facts. We have nothing but good will and hope for the Library but not at such an obvious waste. Respectfully, you should speak for yourself Colin.
http://www.loopnet.com/property/16169834/440-Kings-Village-Road/
43 acres of land with nine buildings containing 204,000 s.f. of space. Beautiful office, clean rooms & manufacturing space. The site has a well and city water with reverse osmosis; and a secure campus.
Off Mt. Hermon Road in Scotts Valley Ten minutes from Santa Cruz
But I guess their brainshild will get voted on when the time comes.
You choose:
20,000 square feet, for 4.5 million, cinder block.
or couple hundred feet away.....
204,000 square feet on 43 acres for $7 million.
One existing building could be library, rest leased out or sold.
http://www.loopnet.com/property/16169834/440-Kings-Village-Road/
Would you invest in Scotts Valleys future, or a special interest that benefits a few?
Walk around this area, see for yourself, you decide if they are the best people are making decisions for you!
251 Kings Village Road
Scotts Valley, CA 95066-4025
43 acres of land with nine buildings containing 204,000 s.f. of space. Beautiful office, clean rooms & manufacturing space. The site has a well and city water with reverse osmosis; and a secure campus.
Now why would we want pesky citizens offering up stupid alternatives to our brilliant plans?
43 ACRES, adjacent to town center, plenty of space to lease out for income to pay mortgage, and OH WELL.
Shame on me for questioning your superior minds!
You make a good point.
You certainly bring up this 20% number anytime someone mentions they are not happy with this council's behavior as if to say "so what, 20% of the people don't like what we do, you can't touch us".
Not only is this an arrogant attitude for a council member of any city (something I know first hand you have an issue with) but it tells us what you think of the intelligence level of our citizens and their ability to rally against this sort of "cocky" behavior.
Further, if you are saying this in public, then we now know you are operating under this assumption when you are making decisions for our city ("they can't stop us"). This is how Jim Reed passed the library - made up a bunch of numbers, left out the cost of the building and other things to keep us guessing and pass a giant $19mil library project without our vote.
Just because 20% of residents speak out on your policies does not mean that 80% of us support you. That is more of your "fuzzy" economics.
You have my attention. Let me help you understand how this works. I will show you.
20%.......come on......show up and make a difference you 20%.
I just ran some numbers.
Why didn't this council lease a large space like the sports building, 20k square feet, at Borland or the Granite Creek Business Complex for $240k a year, spend the $2.4mil they had reserved to retrofit and equip it and be done with it!
This would save us close to $17mil over the 30 years, the city gets out of the real estate mogul business and there is no 30 year bond to pay back for a non-profit library, something few expect to survive the next 5-7 years. Libraries are going away, when is the question yet our council is "investing" in one. Go figure.
Why are they going into deep debt to invest in a library and leave so much space on the table unoccupied in that facility?
This is not about the library, it's about grabbing real estate for an unapproved town center project and this council is being less than transparent about it!
maybe those day laborers coming from the new Lowe's will do some knitting while they wait for the express 17. Now that the reserves are used up, it's time to tax tax tax, and still the middle school is dripping from decay.
We REALLY need new leadership.
I applaud Mr. Bach and Mr. Kertai for their unwavering service to this community, protect us from residents who end up on our city council with personal and biased agendas and then think they "own" this town. THIS IS OUR CITY.
Kertai and Bach might be getting labeled as mean spirited, but I have seen the city council tapes and what they are doing is nothing short of heroic. They are bringing small town city council bad behavior to the forefront. Exposing this council's lack of experience and integrity. Those who attack these men for demanding the truth is where the problem lies in our community.
Keep the facts flowing! Great Stuff.
Oh and btw, Jim, your hair looks marvelous!
I have be watching the bantering going back and forth here and have to tell you that regardless on how "You" spin this to make Mr. Bach look wrong here, you are still going to lose. Let me tell you why.
The facts are the facts.
This library was passed in a very non-transparent way so much that my wife and neighbors are fuming at the city council for spending so much money on when there are so darned many more priorities in this city right now.
Do not lose sight of how this got passed:
FACT: This council quietly negotiated and purchased the Sports Complex without an appraisal and purchased it with little initial public fanfare, something unheard of in other cities.
FACT: The intent on purchasing the complex was to secure the property for the planned town center using creative financing and expiring library reserves for a building that was too large for its purpose. They used a "feel good" library project for cover to secure the real estate and avoid community criticism. (Citation: Jim Reed 10/9 Press: the sports complex is too large for the proposed library and the excess space has no purpose as of yet) Do you ask yourself why did they go into great debt and rob sewer reserves to buy THIS building with our existing commercial vacancy rate at an all time high? Would it have been more cost effective to find a larger space that was was within our means or closer to the $2.5mil reserve?
FACT: After the dust settled from the controversy of paying a premium price for the sports complex, Jim Reed began his campaign to mislead the community by referring to the library project constantly thereafter as a $5mil library and investment in the community. He consistently and conveniently leaves out the purchase price of the sports complex building cost making the total cost of the library including financing charges nearly $19mil. I say he either needs a refresher in economics or get his mouth washed out with soap. Tisk, tisk.
FACT: At the council meeting the evening they approved this, Randy Johnson specifically asked Steve Ando and city attorney whether they were required to seek two-thirds vote by the community to secure the debt (bond) to finance the project. Mr. Ando said "no" but the interest rates were not preferred because of the high debt the city has and we have lost our rating. Many believe this statement alone tells us how this council is maverick, operating without checks and balances and working the loopholes to avoid engaging the community. The worst case of a lack of transparency I have seen in my 20 years here. Mr. Bach is right on the money here people!
FACT: On the same evening the council approved spending nearly $19mil on a non-profit library/real estate purchase with our money, Jim Reed yet again refers to the project as a $5mil library even with Steve Ando's Costs & Uses sheet sitting right before all of them saying it was $19mil with interest. Some call his statement misleading. I say he was being intentionally deceptive again, lying to us, to put the lower cost on record in the public eye even though the Costs & Uses sheet said otherwise. Deceptive? Misleading? Lying to avoid our vote? You decide.
So why did Jim Reed call it a $5mil library in the press and at the council meetings until it was approved?
Because if Jim Reed would have been honest and said "we should engage the community and see if they want to spend $10mil on a non-profit library ($19mil with interest)" he and his voter's block council would have never received the authorization to spend this amount of money during a tough economic time and while our finances are running a deficit.
Furthermore, with the Library council already cutting the budgets ($1.3mil) and the size and scope of this project, we may end up with an empty building we own and all the debt that comes with it.
If you truly love this city you need to make sure you vote this year to get this sort of shenanigans off of our council.
Jim Reed comes up for his first election this year (Jim Reed was appointed to the council and appointed to be the mayor). Appointed. Not elected.
Now is the time to bring back honesty, transparency and integrity back to our council. No tricky politicians allowed!
Citation: All the information I have stated here is a matter of public record and is either on file in the city council in the minutes of the meetings, in the newspapers leading up to the library project or is on tape during the council meetings. This information will be made available soon on a new website being released. We will show the community how we are being steamrolled, manipulated, misled by this current voters block council we have (Reed/Johnson/Lind/Bustich).
Let's get back to business Scotts Valley!!!!!