Scotts Valley garbage headed out of county
by Press-Banner staff
Dec 23, 2009 | 1109 views | 8 8 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To save residents money on trash pickup, Scotts Valley will haul its garbage nearly 40 miles to Marina, instead of taking it to the county-run landfill in Watsonville.

The City Council unanimously agreed at the Dec. 16 meeting to sign a 30-year deal with Monterey Regional Waste Management District to dispose of Scotts Valley’s rubbish.

The Monterey Regional Waste Management District runs a landfill in Marina that charges $28 per ton for disposals taken to the dump, which is $40 less than the county-run Watsonville landfill price of $68 per ton.

“Staff is always looking for ways to save the city money,” Mayor Jim Reed said. “We’re glad we found a superior deal.”

The move comes because the county’s trash fees have increased steadily in recent years, often to more than the Consumer Price Index, according to a report by city staff.

For example, in 2006, county’s disposal fee increased from $60 a ton to $66, Reed said.

The contract with Monterey Regional Waste Management District promises disposal fees won’t climb higher than the Consumer Price Index each year.

“It gives us the certainty that we won’t have increases higher than the inflation rate,” Reed said. “It’s a certainty we didn’t have before.”

Scotts Valley generates less than 10,000 tons of trash a year, according to the staff report.

The decrease in disposal fees will be offset by extra transportation costs to haul trash a greater distance. However, Reed said the main benefit of the deal is saving ratepayers from future unpredictable rate hikes.

“It’s my understanding that the city will still come out ahead,” Reed said. “Because of this change we made, ratepayers will not be affected by tipping fee increases.”

Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
resident sv
|
January 04, 2010
I am concerned with the new negotiations with our waste provider that the banner says is to save us money.

I did a little research and found the following intersting facts.

1) current rates are as follows for Green waste

20 gal 13.02 New rate is 11.81 the only one that went down

35 gal 13.65 New rate is 17.78 25% increase

64 gal 29.77 New rate is 35.46 20% increase

96 gal 43.74 New rate is 53.00 19-20% increase



Dumpster rates as follows

1 yard 93.14 New rate 116.10 25% increase

2 yard 150.98 New rate 192.38 27% increase

Is it only me or is this a little odd.

Of course Green Waste is agreeing to go with the Consumer price index as they are getting a large increase up front.

I was told by Scott Handy the one in charge of these grand negotiontions.

That now we are to receive free (normally 3.14) yard waste pick up.

Imagaine that, we have a free one by the fire

dept now.

I think again the Emperor has no clothes

Wake people and don't believe all they tell you.

If the dump rate per ton is 20 vs 68.

Where does that savings go not in our pocket that is for sure

In 2006 the county dump rate went from 60 a ton to 66 a ton

just recently it went from 66 to 68.

That doesn't justify several raises a year from both

Green Waste and the previous service Waste

Managment.

Watch out as you all know they are planning a increase of water rates as well. So after a year or so of conserving, our thank you is higher rates.

Ask questions as how much do they pay their employees from what I hear it is much higher than the private sector with life time health care after only 10 years of service.

We are worried about a target store as the gov't in place is robbing us blind.
New Dump
|
December 30, 2009
Now when it gets time to find where to dump, they will say it was good enough for Marina, now it's good enough for Scotts Valley. They have a pit to fill any way. You can't count on republican control forever, and the backlash will be ..proportional.
ms1
|
December 30, 2009
SV residents pay a county refuse fee (9C; check your tax bill -- $56.94/parcel) that should retain our access to both Ben Lomond and Buena Vista. Getting lower dump fees, or at least more predictable future dump fee increases, is intended to prevent the contracted hauler(currently, Greenwaste)from passing on unexpected rate increases to the residents. It appears that Marina has "successfully" marketed their dump space, and Santa Cruz has "successfully" diverted some quantity of waste in order to forestall the eventual closure of Buena Vista. So this may be good for all involved. Financially it may not ultimately mean that much to SV residents but trying to site a new landfill in SC County is a horrible challenge and something to avoid as long as possible. Reduced garbage amounts (due primarily to expanded recycling programs) have done a great job at extending the life of the current landfill. We should be grateful.
jt69
|
December 28, 2009
No mention was made in the article about the new arrangement Scotts Valley about

1. whether the current collection company will be replaced

2. whether Scotts Valley residents can haul refuse to the county collection site in Ben Lomond or Watsonville, or if they will be forced to drive to Marina to dispose of refuse (I use the Ben Lomond transfer station for disposing of occasional yard waste and toxic liquids like cleaning soaps - 409, etc.)

Perhaps you could do some more research and report about these items in a future issue of the Press Banner?
Reset
|
December 24, 2009
Must have a point to make you respond...lol.

There the Reed Defenders spring into action again!

I think Reed owes us some answers, inquiring minds want to know.
Conflict of Interest
|
December 24, 2009
Did you ever notice how one Lind sits on the council and also serves under the Chief as a volunteer Police officer? Isn't that being your own boss? Looks like there are many Conflicts of interests in this City Council. makes you wonder why they don't end the pattern of conflict of interest and start actually serving the interests of the entire city, not just their favorite 10%.
love scotts valley
|
December 24, 2009
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
Double Check?
|
December 23, 2009
Did Reed give Watsonville the opportunity to match the offer? If not why not? A closed bid is not an appropriate method when the result could have been the same contract in Watsonville, then the savings would be something that would be MORE than the contract signed, and the story fails to identify the extra costs, which WILL increase overtime, like gas and maintenance, and insurance among other things.

Not to mention, it gives a black eye to the City from everyone else in the county for not dealing with out own trash problem.

I think that this is another vein attempt to scratch a desperate win during the election cycle.

Show real leadership and bring change that will be edifying to the city and residents, this is not it.

The Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have done unto you.

Would you want Marina shipping their garbage to the Scotts Valley landfill?

What genius thought this was a good for the residents?

Smoke and mirrors.



We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at pbeditor@pressbanner.com.