Dad lives in the Rocky Mountains of Montana, where owning a chain saw is right up there with having a good 4-wheel-drive pickup. It’s where he taught me to water ski, drive a stick shift and climb glaciers, even though I preferred my mom’s lessons of cooking, cleaning and, especially, shopping.
So I didn’t mind the trip to Scotts Valley’s hardware store on Black Friday. But to get a chain saw? And an ax? Were those really necessities?
Well, yes. And leave it to nature to build my dad’s case.
We arrived home late the next night, after dining in San Francisco and reveling in the crowds at Union Square. Half of Scotts Valley was in the dark, thanks to high winds and downed power lines. We started up the driveway to my house and were greeted by ever larger branches on the road, until they turned into two huge trees that blocked the way entirely.
With just the light of my cell phone, we picked our way around the wreckage and trekked up to the house. The next morning, nothing could have made Dad happier than to discover that the downed trees were oaks. He’d been bemoaning the fact that I had only redwood limbs to burn in my stove. Oak is the stuff real fires are made of, apparently.
So I discovered the true meaning of living in the mountains — and being my father’s daughter. That chain saw was exactly what we needed to cut the trees into foot-long chunks and split them in fourths with the ax. And now? I have a full stack of the best firewood around to get me through the winter.
Another first in my year of firsts. Thanks, Dad! And for the record, never let it be said I’m not a true Montanan at heart.
Now for the dogs
My most recent column about Chancey (“In defense of carrying small dogs,” Nov. 27) drew a firestorm of comment on our Web site. Last time I looked, 96 postings were left for me on the bottom of the story.
Commenters from across the country asked not only for my head but for my job, suggesting, I suppose, that I fire myself, since there’s no one else around to do it. They also suggested that I be fined and sent to jail for parading my dog as a true service dog and then bragging to the world about it.
One of the rare folks who came to my defense was a friend, Lee, from Kentucky. He never goes anywhere without his black eye patch and service dog, Baby, who works with him in hospitals, hospice and drug rehab clinics.
They’ve traveled everywhere together, including trips to visit me in California. Lee knows how much I love animals and how I’ve rescued so many that I named my last home Lost Dogs Farm.
He understood my intentions. But service dog people are touchy, he said, because of those who try to pass off their regular dogs as legal service dogs that are trained and certified to perform tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability. Those people try to get them into hotels and on planes and even go so far as to use their pseudo-service mutts for drug transportation. Not good.
I used the term “service dog” as a metaphor, with the intention of highlighting the comfort that dogs give us humans. But some people thought I was flip with the term and with the very serious job that service dogs perform.
If nothing else, I hope my column opens the conversation about what a service dog is and isn’t. I know I learned something.
• Year of Firsts is an occasional column by Cheri O’Neil Matthews, publisher of the Press-Banner, who moved recently to Scotts Valley. She’s a longtime newspaper editor/reporter and vice president of the California Press Association. Reach her at cheri@pressbanner.com or 334-6300.





Original article that started it all has 2,214 views and 100 posts http://www.pressbanner.com/pages/full_story/push?article-Year of Firsts- In defense of carrying small dogs &id=4903629-Year of Firsts- In defense of carrying small dogs&instance=home_community#cb_post_comment_4903629
Letter to the Editor re: the first article has 766 views http://www.pressbanner.com/pages/full_story/push?article-Letter- Fake service dog is no joke- &id=4997131
Air pollution maximus, heat output minimum.
Poison oak burns good too, has a lovely odor, and will make sure your downwind neighbors really love your arrival.
Make sure you burn all your chinese wrapping paper also. The toxins are so much more effective when inhaled. It is fun to watch the wildlife twitching in spasms, as they die.
Lets see if Darwin was right?
Your just writing these things to see who did not graduate elementary school right?
Leading to an article shaming the city for the plight of the middle school, is my bet.
Use shorter sentences, and tell them when you being mockingly sarcastic. So they do not think you are being serious.
I agree with you. People get over yourselves. Quit whinning after all she only broke the law. Stop acting like a bunch of victims. Next time you are stopped and given a bunch of grief because you try to take your real service dog somewhere tell them they are nothing but crabby know-it-alls. Next time you have to appear before a judge to prove your dog is a service dog because store management is fed up with fakers remember the good advice you got here.
DON'T EMBARRASS "SD" ANYMORE. Good grief I hope you get over yourself.
At for whether or not the service dog in question is a service dog or a therapy dog: Perhaps he's both. Perhaps you haven't considered using your service dog to help others (or, bringing it with you as you helped others). As victims, the world owes you - right? Get off it.
Maybe it's time you took a leave of absence from this paper, and went back to journalism school. You obviously FAILED to learn how to properly research before you publish.
I hope you do get charged with faking a service dog. We're not being "touchy", this is a very serious issue for us alter abled folks that actually need service dogs. What you did and what you wrote about in your first article was both illegal, and extremely offensive.
This "apology" you issued is offensive as well. You broke the law and instead of owning up to it called the many service dog users who your actions effected "touchy" and accused us of misunderstanding you. We're not stupid!
Maybe after you get that nice hefty fine for breaking THE LAW, you'll issue those of us that you have harmed a REAL apology.
Just for kicks can you make the next one more controversial than the last one?
Suggested topics - global warming, immigration, women in the workforce, to breastfeed or not paper vs plastic, boxers vs briefs.
Thanks much.
Guess you can't grasp the concept that the US Government uses it as a legal definition.
Talk about not getting it! Read the earlier replies. They address the other errors in your post.
A really great site for anyone who really wants to know about service dogs and fed and state laws is Service Dog Central at www.servicedogcentral.org
They have members who have worked in their own states to have service dog laws passed so they know what they are talking about.
You can go there to learn the difference between a service dog and a therapy dog.
A service dog is only for somebody who is disabled. A service dog is only a dog who has been trained to do tasks that directly mitigate the person's disability. Comfort/emotional support/social help/etc. are not tasks (or work) and do not make a dog a service dog.
Not all service dogs are certified, but all service dogs are to be well-trained in both tasks and public access, as per the law. (A misbehaving service dog can be kicked out of a business legally.)
I suggest you check out the Web site of the International Association of Assistance Dog Partners - http://www.iaadp.org - for information on what is/isn't a service dog, what is/isn't a task, what the laws are, etc. Contact them if you need more information.
"Disabled service dog handlers are touchy and don't understand metaphors."
Now we now who just squeaked by in journalism school. Nepotism is a great thing.
That was an apology?
She had said she was going to write an article about a friend's service dog. So she writes that her friend who may have a service dog, or is it a therapy dog, mentions that service dog users are touchy. Her friend doesn't even know that service dogs are not required to be certified so now she just passed on that little misinformation onto more people via her article.
While it is nice that she loves dogs have anything to do with the topic? Is it to show that even though she writes about breaking the law that she is still a nice person?
She said she learned something. What? That it is wrong to try to sneak a dog into a hotel or onto a plane but nothing about it being wrong sneaking a dog into a store.
Also, a dog that visits hospitals and schools is therapy dog, not a service dog. Can't you even get an apology right?
I carried him into REI in Berkeley the other day, right past the sign that says “Service Animals Only,” and no one said a word.
Quote from Now for the dogs:
used the term “service dog” as a metaphor, with the intention of highlighting the comfort that dogs give us humans.
So??? What part again of the first quote is the metaphor?
This article: "Last time I looked, 96 postings were left for me on the bottom of the story."
Last time I looked there were 99 as of December 9 and let us not forget the letter to the editor: Fake service dog is no joke with 18 posts.
This article: "They also suggested that I be fined and sent to jail" No one suggested it but several did say that if caught and taken to court you could be fined and given a jail sentence.
"Those people try to get them into hotels and on planes ...." and let us not forget try to get them into stores.
"But some people thought I was flip with the term and with the very serious job that service dogs perform."
Some? How about many people thought the whole article was flip. When we heard that you planned on writing an article about service dogs we thought OK now she will at least come out and say sorry. But no, we hear about your friend with a service dog (or is it a therapy dog?) who talks about "service dog people are touchy, he said, because of those who try to pass off their regular dogs as legal service dogs that are trained and certified to perform tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability."
Lee, if you read this please look again as service dogs are not reguired to be certified. And it is a little more than they are trained to perform tasks. They are individually trained tasks that metigate their handler's disability.
"comfort that dogs give us humans" is not a task of a service dog but that of a pet dog.
The term "service dog" was not used as a metaphor in your article, and you failed to address several key points that I know many disabled service dog handlers brought to your attention.
You will find it much easier to spit wood with a maul. Hopw your chainsaw is German. Welcome to the mountains