Year of Firsts: Can we build a better library?
by Cheri O’Neil Matthews / Press-Banner
Nov 12, 2009 | 989 views | 9 9 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In this economy, and in this era of the Internet, it’s nice to see a library that hasn’t taken the plunge of the daily newspaper and nearly vanished from the community.

People of all ages pack into the 5,300-square-foot Scotts Valley Library whenever it’s open.

Last Monday afternoon, I counted a dozen knitters crowded elbow-to-elbow into a corner next to tables of tutors, students, researchers, job-seekers and laptop-users. Spare seats were a hot commodity.

Not only that, Scotts Valley plans to more than double the size of its library by 2011. This is a first for me, and maybe a first for a lot of other people as well.

The public library has become the nerve center of our community, a place where intellectuals coexist with the more practical-minded, the crafts-minded, the political-minded. In short, virtually all of us.

Of course, this part of a building, tucked behind Nob Hill Foods in the Kings Village Shopping Center, was never meant to house the town’s library for all time. Several years ago, the city proposed building a landmark library at the top of a village green in the Town Center. The city started the year with more than $2.7 million in redevelopment money, accumulated over almost 20 years, along with developer fees, all earmarked for a library.

But the Town Center, Scotts Valley’s long-awaited commercial-residential development, met with some roadblocks, thanks to the sputtering economy, and the new library was suspended like a book on a high shelf.

Then, last spring, the Scotts Valley Sports and Event Center was put up for sale, and city leaders figured the 22,600-square-foot skating rink could be converted into a book barn. They decided they could remodel a little over half of it for the library and lease the rest to a commercial business.

The city floated some bonds, paid $4.5 million for the building, hired an architect for $500,000 and made plans to spend another $3.5 million for improvements. That $8.5 million sounds like plenty of money to create space for children, knitters and Marian the Librarians. But when you think about it, it’s not enough.

Scotts Valley doesn’t have enough money to create a facade like one of the fabled Carnegie libraries. Our library will still look a lot like a concrete-block warehouse. And it’s unlikely that Santa Cruz County’s budget for staffing, technology and the ever-important collection of books and DVDs and other materials will grow fast enough to fill the cavernous space.

So that leaves me with a thought that I’ll climb out on a ledge to say here: Is there more we can do to turn this old skating rink into a welcoming library, with high-tech materials and low-tech books? Can we seek private funds and grants? Can we include a coffee shop to add ambiance, as other libraries have done? Can we include an online section of things like auto repair manuals, as other libraries have done so successfully? Would we consider partnering with a business to build an outside patio and clad the concrete blocks with sandstone?

Wouldn’t it be nice to know we could crowd a converted skating rink with local readers of every age and background far into the future?

I think a town that’s ready to double the size of its library is a place where that can begin to happen.

Book-lover alert

Speaking of books, are there many book-club lovers out there? I’m thinking of forming one on behalf of the Press-Banner.

I’d love to hear what you think. What kind of books would you like to discuss? Who would you like to talk about them with? When would you like to do it?

If you post your responses in the comments section under this story, we’ll get the discussion going!

Hair-raising response

In my last column, I asked for hairdresser suggestions and was inundated with more than 50 e-mails and phone calls. A woman dropped off shampoo and conditioner for me, and a man asked if I’d send him my findings so he could score points with his wife.

So now I need to bite the bullet, pare down the list — eeny, meeny, miney, moe — and make an appointment.

Thank you to all who responded. You’ve truly made me feel at home.

• Year of Firsts is an occasional column by Cheri O’Neil Matthews, publisher of the Press-Banner, who recently moved to Scotts Valley. She’s been a journalist for more than 30 years and serves on the board of the California Press Association. Reach her at cheri@pressbanner.com or 831-334-6300.
Comments
(9)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
A Frugal $20,000,000
|
December 01, 2009
According to yesterday's Sentinel article Jim Reed's Scotts Valley library is going to cost tax payers $20,000,000. I nearly choked when I read the quote from the Vice Mayor:

"It's going to be a frugal library, but a great library," Reed said.

$20,000,000 - "frugal"? Only in the mind of a spend thrift like Vice Mayor Diamond Jim Reed when he is spending our taxpayer money!
Badda Bing
|
November 26, 2009
Isn't the internet the biggest library ever?

Why are we housing paper books?

...and in Felton, why is a new library proposed for the swamp next to the post office?

There does not seem to be a Library Master Plan, so local small communities just leap at seemingly good deals. Are they really good deals?
anonymous
|
November 17, 2009
Daryl tempesta has the vision of a LEADER.

Make the building pay for itself by supporting the college also! It is the only bright spot in the area that gets sunshine in the winter.

Our kids might be less inclined to drug use, if embraced and encouraged as loved part of community.

Imagine a place which embraces all ages, and learning.

Elastomeric coating for roofs, and now paints could prevent the migration of moisture into this building.

A little birdy says this is the next boondoggle taxpayers are being set up to FIX after the big investment, at super sized costs compared to prevention.

We need a community center, that brings this town together after years of fragmentation, and divisive special interests.

Organize
|
November 13, 2009
Hi Cheri,

You better watch out, the Council uses the voice of the paper to avoid having to actually interact with the public unless it's going into an election year, you might be mistaken for community leader!

But every bit helps, thanks. I think that instead of investing tons of resources to buy books, they should look at digital media, which never needs to be reaplced, is easy to lend, and relend - with no restocking needed, and getting Nook and kindle devices. The three areas of need are:

1) Beginning readers

2) Lifelong Learning

3) Recreational Readers

This constitutes the majority of the areas that needs to be addresed. Using technology to focus on the LL readers, with technology would bring the costs down and the size of the collection up, over time. In fact, system wide resource sharing using digital media is ready now. With the cost savings, it would cover the expenses to get the system going. And with some more create thinking, area tech companies are quite sympathetic. UCSC extention just opened up an IT lab in Santa Clara, Loaded with new everything - $0.

So your instinct to pick up the responsibility of the Council is right on Target.

I would be so happy to help you parse the better ways of doing things that make a world class library, with our without a facade.

Actually, there are lots of ways to make the building attractive, it the view of the Twon Center, this is the perfect venue for 3D art on or around the building.

I'm going to read Grapes of Wrath. Ciao.

Daryl Tempesta
|
November 13, 2009
At, $1,300 a sq ft, Technology is the way to bring these costs down. Look for my suggestions at the next city sponsored Library meeting, they took a long note of my suggestions, still I don't know if they know what in means. It looked like a scripted event that could use a wiki, or a blog to get community input and ideas. it's not the 1900's any more. And with Council member Lind being an Internet expert, you would expect the city to have such a simple online solution thing to capture these suggestions. Common , let's get some leadership.

You have the elephant by the ankles, now what are you going to do with it?

Here is a starter, NEWS.

Cabrillo College is pulling the plug on it's Scotts Valley extension and programs. WOWA hold the press, REALLY? Yep.

Have Cabrillo pay a very reduced lease that divides the building length wise, any revenue is better than a endless money pit as it now stands. make the other half the library. Have the multi purpose room we suggested have a purpose. Classes from Cabrillo.

http://cabrillo.edu/services/scottsvalley/

I have never seen a City Council so asleep at the wheel.

The other good thing, would be to relocate the Post Office, opening up an appropriate site for parking garage; that being next to the Library , and across the street from the Bus stop would create a commuters Mecca and place to park in the Town Center.

Then the kids show up during the day. Then the students during the afternoons and evenings.

Yea, they could really do some good things if they got organized and started capturing this information outside of the good old boy network.

ridiculous spending
|
November 13, 2009
This is a ridiculous expenditure at a most inopportune time when our city is riding dangerously close to becoming insolvent.

With unprecedented tax revenue shortfalls and our budget deficit mounting, work furloughs, etc how can anyone approve taking out a loan right now at awful municipal bond rates and then also raid an emergency sewer treatment reserve to embark on a library project like this?

Sure this is a "feel good" project, it also feels good to buy a brand new car with a loan to take your mind of the fact that you lost your job! It is deficit spending that will turn into increased taxes.

If this council would have sought a two-thirds majority vote from its tax payers, this project would have never passed.

Councilman Reed owns this project. He knows how to manipulate the system and avoid seeking approval to spend our money. He did this by leaving out critical costs for this project in public forums only to let them quietly mount before a swift vote. It left no time for the community to realize costs had hit $19mil. No, Mr. Reed, not a $5mil library (see city council video recording where Reed clearly misleads public). It is $19mil. Nice try.

THIS PROJECT SHOULD BE TERMINATED IMMEDIATELY. COUNCILMAN REED SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM HIS TEMPORARY APPOINTMENT TO OUR CITY COUNCIL SO THAT WE CAN REGAIN TRANSPARENCY AND START ADDRESSING OUR BUDGET DEFICIT NOW.

WARNING CITIZENS OF SCOTTS VALLEY - THIS COUNCIL NEEDS TO STOP SPENDING!!!!!

SVResident
|
November 13, 2009
Ok, so the library is a place for books not a community center. Get the dozen or so knitters out of there and you've freed up a dozen or so chairs. Let them go to Starbucks or Coffee Kat if they want to knit.

This new library will NEVER be built. It's just another ego fulfilling project for our town council to play with.
booklover66
|
November 13, 2009
I've wanted to be in a book club here for years. Please let us know if you find or start one!
17 million not $8.5
|
November 12, 2009
The above article posts the incorrect cost for the Scotts Valley Library. The numbers from the City are $17 million not $8.5 million. Additionally the article should have mentioned that in addition to selling high interest bonds to pay for the library the City also borrowed money from the Scotts Valley Waste Water Management Fund.

Did we really need to spend $17 million for this library. Couldn't we have gotten a really good library for much less than half that amount. $17 million is more than twice the amount in the City Annual General fund.

$4,500,000 to buy the building

$6,700,000 cost to remodel only 13,000 sq feet of the building

$ 533,000 Architect fee for just 13,000 sq feet of building

$5,500,000 Interest payable on the bonds the City will issue to cover the full cost.

----------

$17,200,000 for a 13,000 sq foot library.

This works out to $1,307.98 for each of the library's 13,000 sq feet. Putting this into perspective, it costs every man woman and child in Scotts Valley $1,407.09 to build this. Couldn't we have gone for a little less expensive library?


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at pbeditor@pressbanner.com.