Karen Mulligan
|
May 23, 2013
I would caution attributing too much credit to FLOW. The water takeover effort was primarily run by the county of Santa Cruz bureaucracy with the willing partner San Lorenzo Valley Water District who, of course, was looking to get a $12 million water system for free...on the backs of Felton taxpayers. FLOW were just the useful idiots who parroted anti-corporate slogans and pretended to be grassroots just to rile up uneducated voters.
Sarah Potter
|
May 22, 2013
Wow. Thank you so much. Wish you had been an advocate for us Feltonians back when FLOW worked dishonestly with the local public water district and county bureaucrats to pull the wool over voters eyes.
CAPPPR
|
May 22, 2013
The California Alliance to Protect Private Property, California's leading private property rights organization, has been following the Felton case and others like it for years. These FLOW groups, located throughout the state, promise the world and more to residents in local communities if they take over their private water company by eminent domain. They promise that water rates will go down and residents will have a greater say in the application of rate hikes. They promise immediate savings to residents. But where are they when these promises don't materialize? Where are they when their public water companies raise rates exorbitant amounts? The political agenda of these FLOW groups is NOT lower water costs. The political agenda of these FLOW groups is public ownership of water NO MATTER THE COST to individuals or small businesses. The worst type of eminent domain abuse is when taxpayers get fleeced. Felton taxpayers now know all too well what that feels like. - California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights www.CalPropertyRights.com
Felton Mark
|
May 21, 2013
2pm in Boulder Creek on a weekday seems like a fair time to hold a meeting to draw public opinion...NOT. Hey, some of us have to work for a living, and driving all the way down to BC is not exactly a convenience. But maybe they want it that way. Then they can claim no one showed up in opposition. We should remember, they work for us.
Felton Mark
|
May 21, 2013
And don't forget, Lompico wants to borrow $111,000 from SLVWD to fund thier Retirement Fund. Since when is SLVWD a Bank ?!! Further, Lompico has a $904,000 obligation to CalPers (Retirement Fund) that SLVWD would have to take on if merged. This is snowballing down a rathole. Do you also wonder why there is a building moratorium in Lompico? Because there is a lack of reliable water supply. However, after the merge, or "intertie" I'm sure somebody must own property that could now be buildable...I'm just saying.


We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at pbeditor@pressbanner.com.