Letter: Disappointing reaction from Lompico director
by Brad Smith
Jun 08, 2012 | 1714 views | 10 10 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
EDITOR,

In an effort to educate myself about the possible merger of Lompico County Water District with the San Lorenzo Valley Water District, I have been attending as many meetings as possible. Although there have been many updates on the possible merger, I felt that it would be informative to have each board director formally state their position on the possible merger with SLVWD. I went to the district office and requested an item be placed on the regular board agenda asking each director to state their position on the possible merger and their reasons why they felt that way. I was told my request would be placed on the May 15 board meeting agenda.

At the May 15 meeting, directors Lois Henry, Bill Smallman and Rick Harrington stated they are for the merger for various reasons, including the high cost to run the 500-hook-up district, the current poor water quality and the capability of SLV to assure and administer a sustainable water supply in Lompico. Director Shannar Abraham said he has never been against or for the merger and that he’s interested in getting the best deal possible for the district. Director Sherwin Gott did not like the agenda item and refused to answer.

Gott said (the entire meeting was recorded), “I believe that this is totally ill-placed. I believe that this statement is basically a direct political action. It has nothing to do with the actions of running the district or the board; it’s been very clear what everybody’s position was, because our voting records are very clear on how we discussed the merger, and we’ve probably been voting on this for almost two years now. I find it highly distasteful that you would go ahead and try to say that you (Harrington) brought it on from a public, when you yourself put it on the agenda, but weren’t willing to take that credit.”

He called it purely political and then walked out of the room. Gott poked his head back in the meeting and said he’d like to see his statement as part of the minutes of the meeting.

I would like to thank the directors Henry, Abraham, Smallman and Harrington for their direct responses. I was extremely disappointed in director Gott’s failure to respond to my question, in that I was looking forward to having each director’s reasons and position so that I could make an informed decision on this critically important issue.

Brad Smith, Lompico

Comments
(10)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Iris C
|
June 14, 2012
Whatever your opinion on the water district takeover by SLV Water District, Gott does have a point about the impropriety of the agenda item.

Certainly members of the public have an opportunity to speak during open comment. How many times have we seen that at County Board of Supervisor meetings where someone demands to know an opinion of the Supervisor. The Supervisor just nods and thanks the speaker for their comments.

Sounds like the phrasing of the agenda item by Mr. Harrington was improper.

Also I hope that this is not the beginning of attacks on Mr Gott to make him appear unstable and therefore unworthy of listening to regarding his concerns about a takeover.

I've seen that so many times recently. A letter writer criticizing a candidate was called "crazy" by his campaign team. Whatever happened to substance and dialogue?
Lompico Citizen
|
June 14, 2012
Higher taxes, lower rates, you're missing the point Mr. Smallman. We'll still be paying more money. Lompico won't save a dime merging with SLVWD. Why would we pay to fix our system and then give it away.

This is why we need some new board members, not SLV cheerleaders and certainly not the Lake Blvd crowd who have been the only ones so far to benefit at all from this hoopla with SLV.
Ellen Sheath
|
June 14, 2012
Exactly. You'll be paying to fix up the system, then paying to get SLVWD to take it and profit from it.

You'll pay for an eminent domained "intertie" that will divert water, not only out of Lompico, but out of the San Lorenzo Valley.

Everything that SLVWD and FLOW used as scare tactics to get people to fear Cal Am actually came to pass through SLVWD.
Bill Smallman
|
June 14, 2012
We already pay the highest rates. We have done so for years. If SLVWD takes us over without having to pay for any infrastructure improvement costs, then we will build their customer base, which will increase their ability to provide water at lower rates. Money is the most important issue, and most people who have looked at the numbers, merge vs. no merge, believe it will cost the Lompico residents the same. Anyone in the community has the right to have a Director put any topic of interest on the Agenda, and that all is what Mr. Smith was doing. And, he put on an important one, and that is how a transparent government works. If Mr. Gott and or other community members have anti-merge information to bring to the table, we want the public to consider them fully. How can putting a topic on the Agenda be considered politically motivated to discredit Mr. Gott? On the contrary, denying someone to be able to put a topic on the agenda would discredit Mr. Smith, and would be considered politically motivated.
Lompico Lana
|
June 14, 2012
Bill, it just seems that you and other board members have been dazzled by SLVWD drivel and made up your minds without much other consideration.

Truly SLVWD is not the best steward for Lompico's water system and delivery.

Keep it local.
Lompico Citizen
|
June 13, 2012
Dear No Confusion - Everybody is lying to the people of Lompico. Out water district can and should be fixed and ran in house. No more cover up or blaming other people. If the current board could just see something besides a "merge", good things would happen.

By the way Lompico...say we do merge, we get a $500 per yr per meter bond assessment. Our water rates go down in the short term, but what do you think is going to happen in the future. Our rates will go up, that's a given, SLV has raised rates 30% in the last four years. Our bond will stay the same for it's whole life (20-30 years). So in a few years we'll end up paying 20 times more than anyone else in Santa Cruz County. Just ask someone from Felton Water. Water is not getting cheaper and we need to keep ours in Lompico.
Felton Ratepayer
|
June 13, 2012
It's true. SLV has raised rates dramatically. In my opinion service is way worse (office ladies are just as nice as before, though), water quality seems much worse. Frequent chlorine taste. We used to drink right from the tap. No more. $600/year in property taxes. Not worth it. Big mistake.
Deja Vous
|
June 12, 2012
It's deja vu all over again. Lompico - don't do it!
Lompico Citizen
|
June 12, 2012
Brad - I'm confused by your last sentence in which you state you wanted reasons to make an informed decision on the merger. You were at the April 19th SLVWD meeting and spoke in support of the merger at that meeting. Seems to me your mind was made up a long time ago and this is yet another attempt to discredit Director Gott. Directors Henry, Harrington and Smallman need to get back to the business of running a water district, not brokering the worse merge deal I've ever heard of.
No Confusion
|
June 12, 2012
In your last sentence,any chance you have money to

invest in long term project with a history of

mismanagement & no deferred maintenance with low return?

Let alone the low response to the survey in the water bills!,Increased State & Local regulation..

etc. etc.

Operating a Domestic water system involves lots of physical(not psychic)/mechanical/geological energy,

Perhaps Director Gott can "show" us the way

I unfortunately do not think we have much choice.

...more Indians...less pseudo const.mgrs



We encourage your online comments in this public forum, but please keep them respectful and constructive. This is not a forum for personal attacks, libelous statements, profanity or racist slurs. Readers may report such inappropriate comments by e-mailing the editor at pbeditor@pressbanner.com.